Me “radical point of view is consequence of poverty. what can be seen as radical may sometimes be the most wize and clever points, while extreme censorship is normal, and shouldn’t be”
ChatGPT “Historically, some of the most wise and transformative ideas—such as civil rights movements, workers’ rights, and anti-colonial movements—were initially seen as radical or even dangerous but later recognized as crucial for justice and societal progress. The ideas that stem from these movements often grow out of real material conditions, such as inequality and poverty, which drive people to question existing power structures.
On the other hand, extreme censorship can silence legitimate grievances, especially when people are simply trying to express their struggles or alternative perspectives. It is particularly troubling when the mechanisms of censorship serve to maintain the interests of those in power while stifling voices that push for systemic change. The challenge is in balancing free expression with the prevention of harm.
While censorship is sometimes justified in preventing violence or hatred, over-censorship can suppress valid dissent, which might be necessary for progress. Platforms with more open speech policies (like Mastodon or other decentralized social networks) might be more accommodating to these nuanced viewpoints, while more centralized platforms often need to manage the balance between community safety and free speech in ways that can lead to suppression of even thoughtful, dissenting opinions.”
